On the occasion of International Earth Day, Dr. Deborah Hellums presents IFDC’s advances in fertilizer research in Africa and southeast Asia, and its mission to promote balanced plant nutrition.
By IFA Editor on April 21, 2017

IFA: As Director of Fertilizer Research for IFDC, what are your responsibilities and key priorities?
Dr. D. Hellums: I am responsible for guiding IFDC’s fertilizer research, which includes three major areas: Technology, with the production and development of new products and processes; Soil and Plant Nutrition, which entails research on soil fertility, increased nutrient use efficiency, and balanced plant nutrition and Economics, Policy and Trade, focused on private sector-driven fertilizer market development. This includes areas such as: research on the economics of fertilizer use by smallholders, the cost/benefits associated with the technologies that IFDC promotes, cost build-ups along the fertilizer supply chain, policy recommendations to reduce fertilizer costs and ensure quality, and activities that support ago-dealer development, smallholder associations, and market linkages.br /> br /> My key priorities for our research efforts focus on making sure our staff have the resources and equipment they need for their research, especially for the public good areas of our work. In addition, I help ensure that – whether working with our beneficiaries and partners in our field work or with the private sector – we are listening and responding to the needs of the client in a timely manner.

IFA: How is fertilizer research evolving? What current trends are IFDC identifying in this field?
Dr. D. Hellums: IFDC’s research focuses on smallholders in developing countries in Africa and southeast Asia. For many years, our efforts centered on increasing smallholder farmers’ access to nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizers, usually through promoting smart subsidies and voucher programs. Now we’re seeing the need for more than just N, P, and sometimes potassium (K) – the three primary nutrients.

We continue to research improving nutrient use efficiency (especially N efficiency) and best management practices, but IFDC is also devoting resources to promoting balanced plant nutrition, which includes fertilizer formulations that cost-effectively provide secondary and micronutrients in addition to the “big three” – N, P, and K. We are seeing positive results not only in terms of yield increases but also increased resilience to drought, disease, and salinity. Ultimately, when combined with the current breeding advances, we believe a balanced plant nutrition approach will improve the nutritional quality of the crops themselves, translating into the reduction of global malnutrition.

In addition to seeing a growing need for improved and balanced fertilizer formulations, we recognize the need for diversification of the crops for which nutrient solutions are developed. For many years, IFDC’s work has focused on increasing productivity of staple grain crops, such as rice, maize, and wheat – crops critical for food security. Now and in the future, it also will be important to focus on solutions for other crops, such as vegetables and fruits, especially because of their nutritional benefits. In other instances, cash crops, such as cotton, coffee, and cocoa, that are being grown by smallholders are becoming a part of the applied research agenda.

IFA: IFDC and USAID have very recently unveiled a new fertilizer in Kenya, which in addition to N, P and K, also contains Sulphur and Zinc. Why is it important to tailor fertilizer products for specific crops and soils?
Dr. D. Hellums: This new fertilizer formulation is one of a number that we are introducing in sub-Saharan Africa and southeast Asia to meet various soil and crop needs. These new formulations are important because we are seeing very encouraging crop yield responses to sulfur and some micronutrients. Simply using urea, diammonium phosphate (DAP), and NPKs, as many smallholder farmers are doing, may not result in the maximum economic yield. As noted previously, it is important to tailor fertilizer products for specific crops and soils because we know that soils vary tremendously in their nutrient content because of weathering, the parent material from which the soils evolved, cultivation practices, etc. Virtually all soils are responsive to nitrogen and phosphorus inputs, and many are responsive to potassium, but we are now beginning to see yield stagnation and even reduced yields in many soils due to low levels of secondary and/or micronutrients. It is essential to start integrating secondary and micronutrients into new products to maximize crop yield and nutritional quality.

Also, we will need to look at how these nutrients are delivered. Because they are needed in much smaller quantities, it will be difficult to evenly integrate them and prevent segregation in blends. Researching alternate delivery methods, whether that be through a foliar spray or using another fertilizer product as a carrier, is an important part of our balanced nutrition approach.

We have a diversity of crops, and we have a diversity of soils, and ultimately, the aim is to match the crops’ needs with the ability of the soils to supply nutrients. The formulations and technologies we develop will play a crucial role in enabling soils and plants to reach their full potential.

IFA: IFDC has recently carried out fertilizer quality surveys in several SSA countries. What are the key lessons, and opportunities for IFDC and the industry?
Dr. D. Hellums: In West Africa, the fertilizers tested were in the solid form as either compound or blended fertilizers. Problems identified with quality were primarily more related to the blending process, not intentional adulteration. Since blending was not always properly done, the formulations had different or lower nutrient contents than what farmers thought they were purchasing.

We have expanded this research into similar studies in eastern and southern Africa where we are dealing with both solid and liquid fertilizers. We just completed a draft report on fertilizer quality analysis for Kenya, and we have also completed the chemical analyses for the fertilizers collected in Zambia. Currently, our staff is looking at the fertilizer sector in Uganda. There are differences among the various countries and regions.

The lessons that we have learned to date are that it is important for the neighboring countries to consider harmonizing fertilizer regulations to facilitate trade of quality products, but even if that is done, oftentimes national governments lack the resources for the manpower and laboratory facilities necessary to enforce the regulations and to ensure truth in labeling of the fertilizers on the market. It is important that farmers get the benefits they expect, since fertilizer inputs represent a major cost for smallholders.

For IFDC, the opportunity has been to work with various governments and regional bodies to harmonize the regulations so that some of the cost we see associated with restricted trade can be reduced, thereby reducing costs to farmers, and to help identify problems areas with fertilizer quality so they can be addressed. For the industry, it is important to ensure that the quality of the products they are bringing into the continent is maintained along the supply chain.


About IFDC:

Since 1974, IFDC has focused on increasing and sustaining food security and agricultural productivity in over 100 developing countries through the development and transfer of effective and environmentally sound crop nutrient technology and agribusiness expertise.
About Dr. D. Hellums:

Dr. Deborah T. Hellums currently serves as the Director of Fertilizer Research. Hellums has more than 30 years of experience in soil fertility research to support agricultural intensification in IFDC’s development projects. She has provided technical assistance to a number of IFDC’s projects focused on scaling out improved technologies that increase crop production on smallholder farms and contribute to food security in developing countries.

Making farmers’ voices heard in the global dialogue on food and nutrition security
By IFA Editor on March 30, 2017

Mary Boote, CEO and co-founder of the Global Farmer Network (GFN), works towards making farmers’ voices heard in the global dialogue on food and nutrition security.

IFA: What brought you to the GFN?
M. Boote: What is now known as the Global Farmer Network was started in Iowa by five Iowa farmers and myself in 2000.  The five farmers, original board members of the non-profit organization they began, were concerned that the farmers voice, which continues to hold much credibility with consumers, opinion leaders and influence makers around the world, was not being heard when debate regarding the importance of trade was occurring. That debate was raging in Washington, DC and in many other capitals around the world following the disrupted World Trade Organization meetings in Seattle, WA in late 1999.  Trade is an economic, national security and food security imperative. 

The original mission for the organization remains the same today:  To insert the voice of the worlds farmers in the global dialogue regarding food and nutritional security.

Personally, I have a non-straight career path but agriculture policy, farmers and politics have always played some role in what I do.  I have a passion to make a difference. Today, my role is focused on identifying and engaging articulate farmers from around the world who share our mission and are passionate about engaging on a personal level as well as be part of something bigger than themselves: the Global Farmer Network.

IFA: What are the Key Priorities of the GFN?
M. Boote: The mission is to insert the farmers voice in the global dialogue regarding food and nutritional security. Unique in its make-up and global approach to food security, the GFN identifies, engages and supports strong farmer leaders from around the world who can work with others to innovate, encourage and lead as full stakeholders in the work that is being done to fill the worlds food and nutritional security gap in a sustainable manner.

But it is broader than that.  In the social media/social concern world that we live in, the credibility of the ‘messenger’ has become as important as the message itself.  The vision, perspective and voices of the Global Farmer Network members are powerful and offer great credibility as they make the case for trade, access to innovation, education for farmers regarding progressive agronomic practices and the imperative of farmer advocacy – all backed up by their personal experience as they deal with the challenges of growing more food for a growing population, getting food and feed where it is needed, fight poverty and strengthen their communities. The Global Farmer Network works as a communication platform, allowing them to tell their stories.

IFA: What are the biggest challenges for the agriculture sector today? What role do fertilizers play? 
M. Boote: Listening to the farmers of the GFN, the most significant issues impacting farmers -regardless of where they live and farm are:  Labor; soil health; access to credit and regulatory barriers – impacting everything from trade (getting food and feed where it is needed) to ability to access the technology tools needed to maximize productivity and profitability in a sustainable manner.

Fertilizer access plays an extremely key role for farmers everywhere.  In places like India, GFN members tell us that access to simple soil tests that indicate the amount and type of fertilizer needed to maximize productivity is key.  In other areas, access to fertilizer itself is key and the ability to financially invest in appropriate fertilizer inputs is important to others. Clearly, access to precision agriculture tools that help farmers accurately and effectively apply what is needed -where it is needed -when it is needed is key to sustainable and healthy crop production.  Healthy soil supports healthy plants and ultimately healthy food.  Appropriate and necessary crop protection, partnered with sustainable agronomic practices, help us feed the growing population.

IFA: Farmers are on the frontline of a changing world…. How do they envision their future? 
M. Boote: It is interesting to me that, during a recent Global Farmer Roundtable program in conjunction with the World Food Prize, Dr. Nicholas Kalaitzanonakes, University of Missouri, facilitated the GF Roundtable and asked that very question:  How do you envision the future of agriculture? Without exception, every farmer from the developing world was extremely optimistic and saw a great future in agriculture production.  Each of the farmers from the developed world viewed the future of agriculture with pessimism.  You would think that the opposite would be true.  Understanding that everyone needs to eat – and with a growing global population and rapidly growing global middle class that would demand choice and a better diet for their families – growing enough nutritious food for all should provide a base of optimism.

When asked to expound on their answers, those from the developed world talked about encroaching regulatory barriers, politics and consumer concerns regarding food safety and nutrition as key elements of their view.  What all could agree to is the importance of the farmers’ voice in the world – putting a face on the people who grow your food.  Telling their stories.  Making those stories available through mediums where the world is getting their information and always being open to answer questions, inviting others to visit their farmers and sharing their perspective is – and will always be key – to feeding the world nutritiously. It is possible!  The farmers of this world are up to the challenge.  The Global Farmer Network is engaged in helping them tell their stories.


About M. Boote:

Mary Boote serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Global Farmer Network. Raised on a Northwest Iowa dairy, pork, corn and soybean family farm, she had the privilege of serving as an agriculture adviser to Iowa Governor Terry E. Branstad from 1997-1999. Named as one of the Worldview 100: Global Industry’s top 100 Visionaries and Leaders in Biotechnology by Scientific American Worldview in 2015, Mary has had the opportunity to travel internationally on several agriculture leadership missions that focused on issues as varied as instruction on strategic planning and personal representation for privatized agriculturalists in newly independent countries to learning more about smallholder maize projects to observing the trade negotiation process at the World Trade Organization.

World Water Day: Clean water by 2030
By IFA Editor on March 22, 2017

On the occasion of World Water Day, Jack Moss the Executive Director of Aquafed, the International Federation of Private Operators, advises how to deliver clean water around the world.

IFA: What are AquaFed’s mission, goals and membership?
J. Moss: AquaFed is the International Federation of Private Water Operators. It connects private water service operators with all stakeholders at the international level to share their expertise and find solutions to the diverse water and wastewater challenges. It brings together over 400 private water and wastewater service providers from 40 countries. Membership is open to all private companies active in public water and/ or wastewater service management, or finance through contracts, joint ventures or licenses with public authorities.

AquaFed’s Members operate a wide range of water systems in many countries. These services range from simple rural systems using low-level technology to very large and sophisticated systems that require high-tech treatment processes, SMART networks and advanced data management. Because of the public interest nature of these services, private operators operate under the control of public authorities. This control takes the form of a contract or license. In addition, they are usually controlled by a range of regulators that supervise matters such as water quality, public health and safety, investments, revenue and environmental protection.

As information provider, AquaFed contributes to international discussions on the most important and urgent water related topics, ranging from the Human Rights to Water and Sanitation, through urban water and wastewater management, climate change and sustainable development to finance, regulation, governance and transparency.

Our Members help to ensure water and wastewater services perform well. These services are essential for everybody and necessary to protect the environment and public health, promote individuals’ opportunities and well-being, and support economic development and employment.

IFA: What are its key priorities?
J. Moss: AquaFed’s key priorities are to help the private service operators to deliver high quality sustainable services around the world. These services are provision of safe drinking water, and also collection, treatment and restoration of used water to enable it to be discharged safely back to the environment or reused in beneficial ways.

Wastewater management is often neglected, but is essential for the protection of the environment and humanity against waterborne pollution. In a water stressed world, water pollution makes scarce, usable water, even scarcer.

Further, AquaFed Members assist the public authorities in preparing for, and managing water related risks and disasters, particularly floods and droughts.

IFA: What, in your view, is indispensable if we want to reach Goal 6 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) “Clean Water and Sanitation. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all” by 2030?
J. Moss: Water is a key to all dimensions of sustainable development: the environment, society and the economy. It underpins the ability to achieve all the SDGs.

Because water is the lifeblood of all SDGs, water management is of highest importance for reaching all 17 Goals by 2030. To reach Goal 6, stronger political recognition of the importance of water is essential. Managing water and wastewater requires long term stable political commitment.

A very significant increase in the level of financial investment is needed, to create and restore the vital water and wastewater infrastructure and to ensure that it is operated efficiently. High levels of engineering, finance, customer relations and other professional skills are needed to make the systems work sustainably.

Water pollution kills and maims individuals: people, animals, fish, birds, plants - all living beings. It harms the environment, societies and economies. Coping with water pollution requires much more political will, knowledge and technical facilities. The main causes of water pollution are man-made and are largely avoidable. They are agriculture, urbanization, and industry.

Today there is very little information or data on the damage these pollutions cause, but we know that as much as 90% of wastewater is estimated to be discharged to natural environment without any treatment. Efforts are required to both prevent pollution and to remove it from water that has been used so it is safe for the environment or for reusing it.

IFA: How do you see the role of the fertilizer industry in reaching this goal?
J. Moss: SDG 6 addresses the full water cycle including issues related to drinking water, sanitation and hygiene and also the quality and sustainability of water resources worldwide.

The fertilizer industry’s role in supporting Goal 6 will be to work with other actors to reduce the impact of diffuse agricultural pollution. The balanced use of fertilizers prevents runoff from the land, and therefore reduces the pollution of surface and groundwater resources.

Target 6.3 is designed to address these kinds of water pollution and calls for improving ambient water quality by reducing pollution, eliminating dumping and minimizing release of hazardous chemicals and materials. Further, the industry needs to work together with other stakeholders to improve the water use efficiency and productivity in agriculture, which is related to target 6.4, and the need to feed a growing population (Goal 2).

Our industries, the fertilizer and the water sector, must work closely together to develop beneficial ways of reutilizing the nutrients and other useful resources that can be extracted from urban wastewater. The role of your industry working with ours in reaching the SDGs is therefore important.


About J. Moss:

Jack Moss has 30 years of experience throughout the world in the private sector side of the water services industry. He joined AquaFed in 2005 as senior adviser, contributing to its creation and international recognition. He has been the Executive Director since 2015.

Driving nutrient management in Eastern Europe and Central Asia
By IFA Editor on March 15, 2017

IPNI’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia (EECA) Program consists of two large regions: Central Russia, and Southern and Eastern Russia, with a total area of arable land and permanent crops amounting to 204 million ha. The Vice-President of this region is Dr. Sveltana Ivanova, who spoke to IFA about her role, and her region’s challenges.

IFA: Can you explain what does your role of Vice-President entail, and what are your responsibilities?
Dr. S. Ivanova: When I began working for IPNI in 2007, it did not have any program in the EECA region. I opened the first IPNI office of the EECA in Moscow and created my team, that is still working with me today! My next step was to set up an effective program focused on providing scientific support for IPNI members for developing a fertilizer market in the region.

Currently, our programs consist of research projects, seminars and workshops, training for dealers and the development of printed materials in Russian. Every quarter, we issue and distribute our newsletter in Russian, a 22-page practical agronomy journal.

My responsibility as Vice-President can be summarized to two main functions: to identify opportunities in the EECA region, and to effectively implement the regional program aimed at increasing crop production and promoting proper fertilizer use.

IFA: What are the key characteristics of the region you cover, and the key topics you work on?
Dr. S. Ivanova: The EECA region is very large and covers all former Soviet Union (FSU) countries. It isn’t uniform in terms of agricultural development. We focus mainly on Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan as countries with the largest crop areas. These three countries also face similar issues related to plant nutrition and fertilizer use: a lack of up-to-date, science-based information on plant nutrition and proper fertilizer use in modern crop production; outdated fertilizer recommendations for traditional food, fiber and fodder crops and pastures; and no fertilizer recommendations for crops that farmers have recently started to grow, for instance soybean. Also, we have seen inadequate or unbalanced nutrient applications for P, K, S and micronutrients; inappropriate routine soil testing for P and K; and little to no improvement of acidic or sodic soils. >

Despite these challenges, we have seen a very rapid development of agricultural production in these countries, thanks to the emergence of large commercial farming operations. These farms invest a lot in new equipment, high quality seeds, agrochemicals and fertilizers.

We conduct our research projects directly on these leading farms, narrowing the existing gap between the current crop yield and attainable yield. This is why the results of fertilizer best management practices based on 4R Nutrient Stewardship obtained in regional IPNI research projects can be easily and rapidly implemented into practice.

IFA: Which challenges do you face in the dissemination of fertilizer best management practices, and the 4Rs?
Dr. S. Ivanova: In general, and according to my experience in the region, the principles of 4R Nutrient Stewardship are accepted easily by professional agronomists working in large farms, and by the scientific community.

I believe however that the two biggest challenges for the dissemination and implementation of the 4Rs in the EECA region are related to the availability of the “right source” of fertilizers, as there is a limited number of fertilizer products on the market. The most popular products sold are ammonium nitrate and complex NPKs (triple 15 for instance). The second challenge is their ineffective distribution; which results in the absence of even simple single fertilizer products in some important agricultural regions. Quite often, we have to buy proper fertilizers for our research projects 500 to 700 km away from the location of the research plots!

IFA: Are you currently working on a specific project?
Dr. S. Ivanova: I’m currently working in cooperation with Phosagro on a special program focused on market development for new fertilizer products, such as S-containing fertilizers or liquid N and P fertilizers.

In addition, I continue to work on two research projects with high impact potential on the fertilizer market: the first is focused on intensification of northern forage production, which began last year on a large dairy farm in Vologda - Vologda is the key region for milk production in Russia.

The second project focuses on improvement of recommendations on potash fertilizer use and adjustment of currently used soil K test interpretation classes in intensive cropping systems. The results obtained in this project have allowed us to update our K recommendations for sugar beets, grain maize and rapeseed produced in Central Russia, and to develop new recommendations for soybean.


About Dr. S. Ivanova:

A native of Moscow, Dr. Svetlana Ivanova graduated with honors in 1995 and received her Ph.D. in 1999 at the Lomonosov Moscow State University. Her Ph.D. thesis examined the changes in the buffer capacity of forest podzolic soils to acids and alkalis under the influence of simulated acid precipitations. From 1999 to 2001 she was a research scientist in the Institute of Oceanology (Russian Academy of Science). She worked as agronomist from 2001 to 2002. From September 2002 to 2007 she was employed by JSC “Uralkali”, based in Berezniki, as a senior technical expert. Starting in 2005, Dr. Ivanova worked as coordinator of the China program of the International Potash Institute. In August of 2008 Dr. Ivanova joined the International Plant Nutrition Institute as Vice-President for Eastern Europe and Central Asia region. Throughout her career, Dr. Ivanova has been active in community and professional organizations, including the recent service as member of several task forces of the Agriculture Committee in IFA. She authored an impressive list of scientific publications as well as technical reports and presentations. Dr. Ivanova is a member of the Dokuchaev Soil Science Society of Russia.

The world’s first standard for rice cultivation
By IFA Editor on March 13, 2017

Dr Wyn Ellis, Coordinator of the Sustainable Rice Platform (SRP), speaks to IFA about the world’s first impact-based ‘standard’ for Sustainable Rice Cultivation.

IFA: IFA: In 2015, the SRP launched the world’s first impact-based ‘Standard’ for Sustainable Rice Cultivation, can you explain what the initiative is?
Dr. W. Ellis: The SRP Standard for Sustainable Rice Cultivation is the world’s first voluntary sustainability standard for rice. Developed over a 2-year period with broad stakeholder participation, it is an inclusive tool for practitioners in both public and private sectors. It is a compact standard, with 46 requirements structured under 8 themes, each aimed at achieving a specific sustainability impact.

The impact can be measured using a set of quantitative SRP Performance indicators that can monitor improvement and allow farmers to be rewarded for progress. The Standard aims to drive wide-scale adoption of climate-smart sustainable best practice among rice smallholders. In this regard, the Standard will serve both as a basis for a supply chain assurance scheme, and also as a working definition of sustainability that can inform policymaking

: What are the objectives, and which countries do you hope to impact most?

Dr. W. Ellis: SRP aims to drive wide-scale adoption of climate-smart sustainable best practices and resource use efficiency among rice smallholders. Our goal is to reach 1 million farmers by 2020. Our focus is on resource-poor rice smallholders, mainly in Asia but also in Africa and South America. Currently we are piloting the SRP standard in Brazil, Cambodia, Pakistan, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam and also plan to launch new activities together with our partners in India and Myanmar. We are also in the process of establishing national-level Working Groups to manage implementation of SRP activities in key countries. We welcome the participation of IFA members in these national platforms.

: How is the implementation of the initiative going to be monitored/measured?

Dr. W. Ellis: SRP’s focus will be on impact achieved through adoption of best practice recommendations in developing countries. In-field, these are monitored using a set of 12 quantitative Performance Indicators (that are aligned with the SRP’s Standard’s 48 requirements and 8 themes) covering areas ranging from GHG emissions, water and fertilizer use efficiency and workers’ rights. As these performance indicators are mostly quantitative by design, they can serve as a practical way of measuring the impact of adoption of best practices.

Our targets are as follows: by 2020, SRP will have facilitated a 5% improvement in net farm incomes among participating farmers, along with a 5% increase in water and fertilizer use efficiency, and a reduction in carbon emissions of 700kt CO2eq per year.

In accomplishing these goals, we see an integral role for the fertilizer industry in bringing new resource-efficient technologies to small farmers, many of whom are using fertilizers sub-optimally.


About Dr. W. Ellis:

Dr. Wyn Ellis is Coordinator of the Sustainable Rice Platform, a global multi-stakeholder initiative, working to promote adoption of sustainable climate-smart best practice and resource use efficiency throughout rice value chains. The SRP recently launched the world’s first sustainability standard for rice.

He has 35 years’ experience in Asia, working with UN and other international agencies, governments, universities and corporate clients. His fields of expertise cover value chain standards and certification, organic agriculture, crop protection and agro-innovation. He holds a Ph.D. from Chulalongkorn University in Thailand, and has authored numerous academic publications, book chapters and articles. He also serves on the Editorial Board of several international journals.

Overcoming zinc deficiencies in human populations through agronomic biofortification
By IFA Editor on March 1, 2017

Dr. Ismail Cakmak, winner of the 2016 IPNI Science Award and the 2005 IFA International Crop Nutrition Award, explains how the agronomic biofortification of food crops with zinc can help overcome zinc deficiency in human populations living in developing countries.

IFA: Congratulations for winning the 2016 IPNI Science Award! Can you explain the work that was recognized by this Award?
Dr. I. Cakmak: Thank you. We received this Prize for our long-term efforts in agronomic biofortification, or enrichment, of cereals with zinc. We work towards the objective of reducing zinc deficiencies in developing countries: our Program HarverstZinc, which IFA and other fertilizer institutions support, develops agronomic and fertilizer strategies to counter micronutrient malnutrition. HarvestZinc project has been developed under International HarvestPlus Program and coordinated by Sabanci University in Istanbul.

We’ve demonstrated that foliar zinc fertilizer application is highly effective to improve grain zinc concentration, to reach levels that meet human demand. We used high throughput analytical techniques (using ICP-Laser Ablation Spectometry and X-Ray fluorescence microscopy) to demonstrate that the late-season foliar spray of zinc to wheat results in increased zinc concentration in the endosperm fraction of wheat grain (i.e. the most consumed part of wheat grain). This finding has very important implications for the improvement of dietary intake of zinc in the developing world.

This fertilizer strategy works for a large number of countries, with diverse soil and climate conditions and also different cultivars of wheat and rice. We’ve found that soil zinc applications are very important to improve the grain yield of cereals on zinc-deficient soils. Soil zinc applications also contribute to grain zinc concentration; but not at adequate level for human nutrition. By contrast, foliar zinc application is highly effective in improving cereal grains with zinc at sufficient levels for human nutrition.

: How does Zinc contribute to plant health?

Dr. I. Cakmak: Zinc has critical functions in plant growth; about 10% of proteins in biological systems need zinc for their stability and function. Zinc is also required for the biosynthesis of proteins, and for better pollen viability. Plants that are deficient in zinc are highly sensitive to high light or radiation intensity, heat, drought and pathogenic infections. Plants having a good Zn status show better tolerance to pathogenic attack. In most cases, zinc deficiency in crop plants is “hidden”; it means plants show significant decreases in their yield capacity without showing visual zinc deficiency symptoms. Therefore, it is important to ensure and maintain a good zinc nutritional status in crop plants.

: What are the health benefits of biofortification? In which countries have you tested them?

Dr. I. Cakmak: Today, 2 billion people suffer from zinc deficiencies. This is due to the reduction in daily dietary zinc intake: cereals are inherently low in zinc; so populations whose consumption is cereal-based, namely in developing countries, receive far below the required daily zinc intake (e.g., 15 mg Zn per day). Zinc deficiency can lead to diverse health complications, especially for young children: it can lead to impairments in brain function, mental health, weakened immune systems and also poor physical development.

We’ve conducted field trials in 13 developing and transition countries, including China, India, Pakistan, Thailand, Laos, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, South Africa, Brazil, Kazakhstan, Mexico and Turkey. In these countries, we’ve also organized “zinc days”, to inform and educate growers, agronomists and students on the problems linked to soil and human zinc deficiencies. To our knowledge, several national research programs were started in these countries following these interventions, focusing on agronomic biofortification of food crops with zinc. We also stress the importance of zinc-enriched seeds for better seed quality and vitality, besides the human health benefits. Seeds with higher zinc concentration germinate better, have better seedling vigor and tolerate better environmental stresses.

: Are countries picking up on these biofortification efforts?

Dr. I. Cakmak: I think so, yes. We know of several on-going national research activities and MSc or PhD thesis projects that focus on agronomic and genetic biofortification. In some countries, governments are directly involved in HarvestZinc activities, and in plant breeding efforts of the HarvestPlus Program.

: What is next for your project, HarvestZinc?

Dr. I. Cakmak: Today, we’re also looking at iodine biofortification. It’s part of the third phase of HarvestZinc, which will last three years. Iodine deficiency is another common micronutrient deficiency in human populations, that also has severe health consequences and merits attention. Iodine deficiency is a particular micronutrient deficiency problem, because it occurs both in developing and well-developed countries. Our recent results show that foliar iodine spray is also very effective in increasing grain iodine concentrations of various cereal species. A very new paper on iodine biofortification of cereal crops is ready to submit to an international journal around these days.


About Dr. I. Cakmak:

Dr. Cakmak received his B.Sc. from Cukurova University in 1980; his M.Sc. from Cukurova University in 1981; and his Ph.D. from Hohenheim University-Stuttgart, Germany in 1988. Since 2000, he has worked as a Professor of Plant Physiology at Sabanci University in Istanbul, Turkey. Dr. Cakmak is well known for his research on cereal crops and zinc nutrition. He directed a multi-institutional project, funded by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), on the issue of zinc deficiency in Turkey (1993 to 1998).

The “HarvestZinc” project was developed by Dr. Cakmak under the HarvestPlus Program to improve grain concentration of zinc and iodine in nine different countries (e.g. Asia, Africa, and South America). The focus was on using innovative application methods and novel micronutrient fertilizer combinations.

Dr. Cakmak has authored over 160 peer-reviewed publications, received over 18,600 citations (Google Scholar), and authored/co-authored seven book chapters. He has a Hirsch Index of 71 (Google Scholar), which is a very high value within his field. He has been recognized with several awards including the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation Georg Forster Research Prize, 2007 Australian Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering Crawford Fund “Derek Tribe Award Medal”, the 2005 IFA International Crop Nutrition Award and the Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey Science Prize. Since 2012, he has been an elected member for “The Academy of Europe” and “The Science Academy” in Turkey. Very recently, he has received the World Academy of Sciences Prize, 2016 in Agricultural Sciences.

About the IPNI Science Award:

The IPNI Science Award is intended to recognize outstanding achievements in research, extension, or education; with focus on efficient management of plant nutrients and their positive interaction in fully integrated cropping systems that enhance yield potential.

Training programs helping to meet the challenges of global food security
By IFA Editor on January 20, 2017

Dr. J. Scott Angle, President and CEO of the International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), speaks to IFA about IFDC’s international training programs and their plans for 2017

IFA: Can you describe some of IFDC’s various international training programs and how they help meet the challenges of global food security?
Dr. J. S. Angle: Training is an integral component of IFDC’s mission to increase global food security. We currently carry out two branches of training activities: field training through our projects and professional training workshops.

IFDC takes a comprehensive approach to field training. As it is commonly said, a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, so we work to strengthen all links in the agricultural chain. This includes building the capabilities of not only farmers but input producers and suppliers, agro-dealers, policymakers, and government representatives, among others. In 2015, our field projects in Africa and Asia trained nearly 900,000 individuals, 36 percent of whom were women, thanks to our cascading training-of-trainers approach. Agricultural development is often a long-term endeavor, and human capacity building is essential to accomplishing our goals.

IFDC has been holding international training programs since our founding in 1974. Since then we have held more than 700 formal workshops, study tours, and training programs, and since 2001, we have partnered with IFA to host several specifically for professionals in the fertilizer industry. Our specialized programs are geared toward strengthening the skills of fertilizer industry professionals and focus on technology transfer along the entire agricultural value chain. These programs include presentations given by staff from IFDC and other partner organizations, field trips to relevant locations, and built-in networking time to connect with individuals from organizations around the world. Since IFDC has been implementing professional trainings, we have served more than 11,000 participants from 150 nations. While each attendee has a unique experience, we craft both theoretical and practical takeaways. Many have contacted us years after their training experience to let us know the materials and knowledge are still relevant to their everyday work.

: How is the training implemented?

Dr. J. S. Angle: Most, if not all, of IFDC’s field programs include training components. Each project has varying goals and objectives, so training is tailored to those. For example, our USAID-funded West Africa Fertilizer Program’s (WAFP) objective is to improve the supply and distribution of appropriate and affordable fertilizers in West Africa. For this project, training looks more like working with agro-dealers to sell appropriate inputs to farmers in affordable bag sizes. For another project, such as our Scaling Up Fertilizer Deep Placement and Microdosing Technologies in Mali (FDP MD) project, we work with partners to train farmers to use improved fertilizer technologies to increase their cereal yields. So, each project’s goals require varying training approaches.

: What are IFDC’s strategic plans for 2017?

Dr. J. S. Angle: A strategic plan is currently under development. Development began with listening sessions around the world, hearing from elected officials, private companies, NGOs, farmers, and anyone else with an interest in what we do. The final plan will be rolled out in mid-2017. However, there are several elements that we know will be in the plan.

First, IFDC needs to enhance its scientific capacity. Traditionally, IFDC has been the source of new and novel ideas in the fertilizer industry. This capacity has eroded over the years, but we aim to invigorate both our basic and applied scientific abilities.

Second, we plan to contribute to the training of a new generation of professionals with expertise in fertilizers and soil fertility. All segments of the industry complain that they are having trouble hiring employees who have a background in these areas. Whether we are educating high school students through work at our headquarters or helping to establish a new master’s degree in Fertilizer Science and Technology at an international university, IFDC will be an important player in workforce preparation.

Last, we know we need to improve our ability to tell the message of the good work done at IFDC. In such a large organization, it is not easy to summarize the impact of our work in ways that are interesting to those who support our efforts. This is referred to as “Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning” (MEL). How do we tell the story of literally millions of farmers whose lives are better because of programs delivered by IFDC and our partners? We hope to become a model and leader in this area.

: IS there a particular region or country-focus for 2017?

Dr. J. S. Angle: Currently, IFDC focuses primarily on Africa, and this will continue. Africa is where the greatest needs and opportunities exist. Africa currently uses only about 10 percent of the nutrients needed to bring yields up to the world average. Where our programs have been implemented, it is not uncommon to see yields increase threefold, sometimes more. We currently implement other programs in Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Nepal. However, we believe needs and opportunities also exist in several areas of the world where IFDC has the capacity to improve agriculture. Southeast Asia represents an area where our expertise can support more efficient agriculture. The problems and needs are different from those in Africa, for example, often requiring different approaches to improve soil fertility with a focus on environmental quality. Haiti and several countries in Latin America can also greatly benefit from the technologies and information IFDC offers. We are currently exploring whether it makes sense for IFDC to initiate programs in these countries.


About Dr. J. S. Angle:

Dr. J. Scott Angle is president and CEO of the International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), a public-international organization providing solutions to alleviate global hunger and poverty through the promotion of sound agricultural technologies, economic development, and self-sufficiency.

Feeding the world in a sustainable way: the importance of nutrient stewardship
By IFA Editor on January 2, 2017

Dr. Harold Reetz Jr. presents his latest book “Fertilizers and their Efficient Use”, published by IFA

IFA: Your book explains what fertilizers are, and why they should be managed efficiently. Why focus on this topic?
Dr. Reetz, Jr: Because fertilizers help feed the world. They are responsible for approximately half of the world’s food production today. 48% of the global population lives thanks to the increase in crop production that was made possible by the widespread use of mineral fertilizers. The world’s population is estimated to grow to 9.7 billion in 2050, and its demand in food will continue to increase too, but in a context of shrinking arable land and climate change.

It’s therefore important for people to know what fertilizers are, how crucial for the global food security they are, and how to use them efficiently to avoid negative effects on the environment and improve farming profitability. This book is designed as a reference guide on their use for farmers and their advisors.

: A key concept in your book is nutrient stewardship, what does it entail?

Dr. Reetz, Jr: Nutrient stewardship refers to the management of plant nutrients in a way that improves the social, economic and environmental performance of fertilizers.

Readers will find an overview of key concepts of nutrient management, like the 4Rs, which entail applying the right nutrient source at the right rate, at the right time, in the right place, but also ways to implement these concepts! Recommendations on how to follow good science and the 4R principles are given throughout the book, such as testing soil or using enhanced-efficiency fertilizers (Right source); estimating crop nutrient requirements (Right rate); tracking weather patterns (Right time); placing nutrients next to the roots (Right place).

The book also presents innovative technologies in farming that have proven to increase and improve plants’ uptake of nutrients, helping increase productivity on arable land.

: What are the main takeaways from your book?

Dr. Reetz, Jr: Fertilizers, when applied following Fertilizer Best Management Practices (FBMPs), not only enhance crop production and farming profitability but also reduce their potential negative impacts on air and water resources. FBMPs fulfil four management objectives of productivity, profitability, cropping system sustainability and a favourable biophysical and social environment; a complete integrated farming system includes FBMPs, crop management, and all soil and plant nutrient management components.

The book also highlights the multiple environmental, economic and social benefits deriving from the 4R nutrient management framework, such as better crop performance, improved soil health, reduced environmental impacts, the protection of biodiversity, the increase in farmers’ profits, the reduced prevalence of hunger and malnutrition, improved rural livelihoods and stronger farmer communities.

  Find out more about the book by listening to our 2016 webinar with Dr. Harold Reetz, Jr. available on YouTube! “Fertilizers and their Efficient Use” is also available for download from our Library.

  About Dr. Reetz, Jr:

Dr. Reetz is an agronomic consultant and owner of Reetz Agroonomics LLC. which provides consulting services in agronomy, high yield cropping systems, precision farming technologies and on-farm research. He previously worked with the International Plant Nutrition Institute, as Midwest Director (US) and as President of the Foundation for Agronomic Research. He has focused his career on integrated crop and soil management systems for high yield crop production, promoting technologies for nutrient management and precision agriculture.

Reducing nitrous oxide emissions and nitrogen losses from fields with the 4Rs
By IFA Editor on October 19, 2016

Dr. Cliff Snyder, IPNI’s Nitrogen Program Director, explains the importance of implementing best management practices to reduce nitrogen (N) losses, and reduce nitrous oxide emissions from farm fields.

: Why is it important to reduce nitrous oxide emissions?

Dr. Snyder: Nitrous oxide is one of the three leading greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide) which contribute to global warming and climate change. It has a warming effect (radiative forcing) about 300 times that of an equivalent mass of carbon dioxide. Nitrous oxide has long atmospheric lifetime (about 120 years) and is the most significant emissions contributor to depletion of the ozone layer in our stratosphere.

Global emissions of nitrous oxide have been increasing. Emissions are estimated to be about 20% higher than what they have been over many past centuries. About 2/3 of the human-induced emissions originate from agriculture.

It is important to recognize that annual emission of nitrous oxide from most farm fields represents a nitrogen loss equivalent to less than 1 to 2 % of the applied nitrogen. Because fertilizer nitrogen (and manure) use is increasing globally, many believe there is a greater likelihood that nitrous oxide emissions will also increase, unless mitigation practices are more widely implemented.

: Does an increase of Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE) result automatically in a reduction of nitrous oxide emissions?

Dr. Snyder: Improved crop or cropping system recovery of the applied nitrogen (one expression of nitrogen use efficiency) usually results in reduced risks of loss of nitrogen from fields via all the major nitrogen loss pathways (nitrate leaching, drainage, runoff; ammonia volatilization; nitrous oxide emissions; di-nitrogen emissions). Yet, because of the episodic and pulsed nature of nitrous oxide emissions - and the number and complexity of management and environmental factors affecting emissions – we have learned that increasing crop recovery of applied nitrogen may not, on its own, always reduce nitrous oxide emissions.

A clearer understanding of the local climate, weather, and soil conditions - and their dominating influence on the soil nitrification and denitrification processes that affect nitrous oxide emissions – can help us better optimize the 4R management (right source, rate, time, and place) of nitrogen application, to help minimize the direct and indirect losses of nitrogen as nitrous oxide.

: What is the optimal way to ensure a high NUE?

Dr. Snyder: Crop nitrogen recovery by major cereal crops in most farmer’s fields averages about 40 percent at the global level, but research has helped us understand that we can raise that recovery to 60 to 70 percent through better cropping system, conservation practice, and 4R nutrient management implementation. These levels can also be reached by farmers adopting best management practices (BMPs). It is important that other essential nutrients (P, K, secondary nutrients, and micronutrients) are adequate and will not limit plant nutrition, or impair nitrogen use efficiency.

The optimal 4R nutrient management program will differ by soil, cropping system, and environmental conditions. There is no single, magical solution to reducing emissions of nitrous oxide; especially while also striving to reduce the loss of nitrogen via other important loss pathways. Nitrogen loss via those other pathways (which can contribute to indirect nitrous oxide emissions) is often greater and causes much larger economic impacts for the farmer and his/her local community. The expertise of skilled agronomists and crop advisers is needed to help identify improved nitrogen management opportunities on a field-by-field basis in order to improve and sustain crop yields, soil fertility and productivity, and farm profitability; while minimizing all nitrogen losses, including nitrous oxide.An important example of fertilizer industry leadership in view of these considerations, is the Nitrous Oxide Emissions Reduction Protocol (NERP), initiated by Fertilizer Canada (formerly the Canadian Fertilizer Institute). NERP aims to reduce on-farm emissions of nitrous oxide in a verifiable way that allows farmers to earn carbon credits. The protocol, based on the 4Rs, is being deployed in the Province of Alberta.


  Find out more about 4R Nitrogen practices by reading IPNI’s new Issue Review entitled “Suites of 4R Nitrogen Practices for Sustainable Crop Production and Environmental Protection”, available here.

  About Dr. Snyder:

Dr. Cliff Snyder is the Nitrogen Program Director for the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI); and coordinates efforts to address environmental nitrogen challenges. He previously served as Midsouth and Southeast Director for the Potash & Phosphate Institute; and as state Extension Soils Specialist with the University of Arkansas. Cliff is a Fellow in the Soil Science Society of America and the American Society of Agronomy; and is a CCA. He received a Ph.D. in Soil Science and Forestry at North Carolina State University; and a M.S. in Agronomy (soil fertility) and B.S. in Agriculture (soil science) at the University of Arkansas.

Ten years after the Abuja Summit, the Smallholders’ Access to Fertilizers in Africa campaign carries on the commitments of the African Green Revolution
By IFA Editor on August 29, 2016

Professor Richard Mkandawire, Vice President of the African Fertilizer Agribusiness Partnership (AFAP) explains the objectives of the Smallholders’ Access to Fertilizers in Africa campaign.

The Smallholders’ Access to Fertilizers in Africa campaign was launched in 2014 by a large coalition of partners: AFAP, AGRA, CNFA, IFDC, IITA, IPNI, IPI, One Acre Fund and IFA. Through the campaign AFAP, IFA and their partners work to enable smallholders to access to critical inputs and services, such as: soil nutrients/fertilizers; financing for purchase inputs; improved seed varieties; crop protection products; irrigation and crop insurance.

: Professor Mkandwire, why is this campaign important? What are its main objectives?

Professor Mkandwire: The fertilizer industry is called upon to increase linkages between agribusinesses and farmers, to open up domestic markets and get inputs to farmers on time and at affordable cost. The campaign is raising global awareness to the critical challenges faced by SMEs and smallholder farmers as catalysts for fertilizer value chain development in Africa, and to encourage the private sector to invest in them. In addition, 2016 marks the 10th anniversary of the Abuja Declaration on Fertilizer for the African Green Revolution signed in Abuja, Nigeria in June 2006. During that Summit, African leaders agreed to improve the access of fertilizers smallholder farmers. Ten years on, a lot has been achieved, but gaps remain that need to be addressed, hence the call of the campaign.

IFA: The campaign was launched in 2014, in conjunction with the FAO 2014 International Year of Family Farming 2014 and the African Union 2014 Year of Agriculture. What is the situation like in 2016?
Professor Mkandwire: The farming situation in Africa has changed and continues to change, blending progress and challenges to attain continental food security. Over the last couple of years, the African Development Bank Group (AfDB) has strongly committed itself to support the transformation of African agriculture. Fertilizers feature prominently in their plans. This has ignited a new hope for the growth of the fertilizer sector and a strong signal to the financial sector. Strategic stakeholders, including governments, are beginning to demand innovative interventions that stimulate increased reach to smallholder famers with timely and appropriate fertilizers. There is clearly a coalescing of voices that demand more efficient, private sector- led approaches to be pursued to support smallholder farmers access and effectively use fertilizers.

The recently adopted Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are an important development to the agriculture sector in Africa. SDGs 1 End poverty in all its forms everywhere and 2 End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture as well as SDG 15 Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss directly address problems facing African farmers today. The fertilizer industry, in partnership with governments, needs to speak with one voice to achieve the objectives of the SDGs, which are an essential component to solving hunger and poverty in Africa.

In addition, policy makers in several African countries have understood the need for good governance when it comes to effective agricultural policies. Some are even contemplating the adoption of fertilizer specific policies, for instance Mozambique. Others, like Nigeria, are opening the fertilizer market to private sector participation. In the face of all these changes, AFAP is providing different approaches tailored to specific needs of countries to ensure the smooth flow of fertilizers from suppliers to farmers as well as financial instruments.

IFA: On 05-09 September 2016, the African Green Revolution Forum will take place in Nairobi, Kenya. What are the expected outcomes of this Forum for AFAP?
Professor Mkandwire: The African Green Revolution Forum is an African owned and driven agriculture platform, where African and global stakeholders come together, discuss policies and policy models conducive to the growth of the agricultural sector. Public and private sector officials are invited as well as representatives of financial institutions. This forum provides a great opportunity for all to act on the wide array of commitments by African leaders and the global international community in supporting an African owned Green Revolution.

This year AFAP and IFA are holding a panel discussion as a side-event at the Forum, which will take place on 06 September with the theme, “Seizing the Moment, Accelerating Fertilizer Usage among African Smallholder farmers”. Farmers, private sector representatives, policy makers and government officials are invited to attend to the panel discussion, where we will address the challenges of promoting the use and access to fertilizers in realizing Africa’s Green Revolution. We are also inviting SMEs to take part in this side-event, as the fertilizer access campaign is targeted directly to them and their feedback is valuable to us. We expect to come out with a strong message in support of our actions that will deliver fertilizer to our smallholder farmers and secure a food future for Africa.

  About Professor Mkandwire:

Richard Mkandawire is currently the Vice President of the African Fertilizer and Agribusiness Partnership (AFAP), a non-profit that works with the public and private sectors to make fertilizer accessible and affordable for African smallholder farmers. Before joining AFAP, Mkandawire was part of the leadership that drove the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), an innovative framework for agricultural development established by African nations and leaders. CAADP began as part of the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) to eliminate hunger and reduce poverty by growing agriculture. At CAADP's inception, Mkandawire played a critical role in engaging support for NEPAD’s focus on agriculture, and advocating for its acceptance by African heads of state and donor agencies. Mkandawire has received awards for his work on CAADP including the Drivers of Change Award and an honorary doctorate from the University of KwaZulu-Natal.

Mkandawire came to CAADP and AFAP with decades of experience as a socio-economist and rural development expert. He earned degrees from the University of Malawi, the University of Missouri and the University of East Anglia. He has taught at multiple universities and is currently an extra-ordinary professor at the University of Pretoria.

Mkandawire continues to lobby for increased investments into the African Agricultural sector for reduced poverty and food insecurity.

Potassium: You cannot overemphasize its importance in South Asian Agricuture
By IFA Editor on July 18, 2016

IPNI’s Vice President for Asia, Africa and Middle East, Dr, Kaushik Majumdar, shares his insights on South Asian Agriculture.

: Why is it important to talk about potassium in South Asian agriculture? What is currently the trend in K fertilizer application in that region?

Dr. Majumdar: South Asian farmers apply inadequate amounts of potassium in crops and cropping systems, leading to yield and economic losses. The current trend shows significant negative balance (input - output) of potassium at local, regional and national scale, pointing towards large-scale mining of native potassium. At a broader perspective, depletion of native potassium in soils may adversely affect future food security and soil health in the region. This issue needs to be in the forefront of discussion to increase awareness of the farmers, scientists and the policy-makers.

IFA: What is holding back farmers from applying K fertilizer to their soils in South Asian countries? How can that be remedied?
Dr. Majumdar: Lack of awareness and last mile delivery of potassium fertilizers are two of the major issues that are holding back farmers from applying K fertilizers. There is a general perception at scientific and policy-making level that South Asian soils are rich in potassium and may not need external potassium application. This perception has percolated to the farmers through the extension specialists. This is a carry-over from the period when population was low, farmers used to grow one crop in a year, yields were low and adding a bit of nitrogen was enough to sustain the crop. Things have radically changed since then...farmers grow three crops in a year, using high yielding or hybrid varieties, producing yields that are three times or more than local varieties! Not applying potassium in such intensive systems is a very unsustainable practice. There is no dearth of field evidences showing large crop responses to potassium, and these needs to be highlighted to increase the awareness at all levels. Farmers often do not get potassic fertilizer at the nearest retailer shop during application time....so the last mile delivery and access to potassic fertilizer needs to be improved, along with awareness, to improve K consumption in the region.

IFA: What are the main takeaways from your presentation?
Dr. Majumdar: South Asia is one of the most highly populated region of the world. Access to affordable food for the large population in the region is a long-term challenge. To address that challenge, farmers of the region will need to produce more from shrinking land and water resources. That will happen only when crops receive balanced and adequate nutrition. Scientific evidences clearly show that declining factor productivity, low N use efficiency, and declining soil health in the region can be adequately addressed through balanced fertilization, and potassium will be the biggest plank for that. Contrary to general perception, potassium application in crops gives adequate return on investment in most locations. So balanced and adequate application of potassium in crops will benefit the farmers and the society now and in the future as well.


  About Dr. Mujamdar

Dr. Kaushik Majumdar is the Vice President, Asia and Africa Programs, of the International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), located at Gurgaon, India.

Dr. Majumdar has a Master’s degree in Agricultural Chemistry and Soil Science from BCKV University, India, and received his Ph.D. in Soil Mineralogy/Soil Chemistry from Rutgers University, U.S.A.

Dr. Majumdar has earlier worked as a Soil Mineralogist at the Potash Research Institute of India (PRII), and later, as the Deputy Director of Eastern India & Bangladesh for the Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada-India Programme, and as the Director, South Asia Program of International Plant Nutrition Institute before joining his current position in 2016.

Dr. Majumdar has developed several fertilizer decision support tools, technical bulletins & training aids, and has over 70 national and international scientific publications. He was the President of the Agriculture and Forestry Sciences Section for the 103rd Indian Science Congress, and also serves at the editorial board of the Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science.